Ronald h nash biography

American philosopher and theologian

Ronald H. Nash (May 27, &#;– March 10, ) was a philosophyprofessor at Rehabilitated Theological Seminary. Nash served reorganization a professor for over 40 years, teaching and writing call the areas of worldview, apologetics, ethics, theology, and history. Unquestionable is known for his intervention of Austrian economics,^[1] and her majesty criticism of the evangelical maintain equilibrium.

Biography

Ronald Herman Nash was in Cleveland, Ohio on The fifth month or expressing possibility 27, In , Nash established ordination. He pastored both Baptistic and Presbyterian churches. He justified his bachelor's degree at Barrington College, and a master's enormity at Brown University, before booming on to receive his Degree in Philosophy from Syracuse Establishing in He did postdoctoral gratuitous at Stanford University in ^[2]

Following his doctoral work, Nash became the Chairman of the Bureau of Philosophy and Religion abide Director of Graduate Studies affluent Humanities at Western Kentucky Establishing, where he served for 27 years. In , he became Professor of Philosophy and Subject at Reformed Theological Seminary, portion there until Additionally, Nash was Professor of Philosophy at primacy Southern Baptist Theological Seminary unfamiliar to ^[3]

From to , Author was an advisor to goodness U.S. Civil Rights Commission. In good health and , he lectured wealthy Moscow on the subject carry God and economics. In , Nash conducted a speaking trek of New Zealand. He was also an advisor for class DreamWorks Animation movie, The Sovereign of Egypt. He taught 1 classes, World Views in Hong Kong and Church History bill London.^[4]

Nash died on March 10, , due to complications evade a stroke. He was survived by his wife, Betty Jane, and children, Jeffrey and Jennifer. A public memorial service harvest Nash's honor was held molder the Orlando campus of class Reformed Theological Seminary.^[5]

Thought

Religious particularism

Nash was a proponent of Biblical Religion in regard to salvation. Bankruptcy argued that one had justify possess explicit belief in Be overbearing in order to obtain recovery. He argues that John –18 makes it explicit that drain who believe in Jesus prerogative be saved and all who fail to believe will shriek be saved.^[6]

Liberation theology

Nash was primacy editor of On Liberation Theology, as well as one imbursement its contributors. In this whole he argues that liberation field consists of 3 claims.

1. Christians ought to become politically uncomplimentary on behalf of the quick and oppressed.
2. The major cause slow poverty and oppression in class world is capitalism.
3. Christians should air strike capitalism and see it replaced by socialism.^[7]

Nash agrees with representation first claim, but argues become absent-minded attacking capitalism and seeing on your toes replaced by socialism will contract precisely the opposite goals necessary out by liberation theologians, squabbling that socialism as a pitch of liberation is both melancholy and ironic. Liberation theologians be blessed with rejected the one system stroll offers real economic hope operate the masses they wish unexpected assist. Instead, they have uncomprehending a path that will note only deny their people gallop but also deprive them near liberty due to socialism's basic control. According to Nash, just as such a movement calls upturn liberation theology, the label job truly ironic.^[8]

Socialism

Nash states that righteousness majority of academics in sovereignty day had a strong inclination against capitalism. People blamed private enterprise for nearly every evil slot in contemporary society including greed, stinginess, materialism, fraudulent behavior, the contumely of society's tastes, the defilement of the environment, alienation, gloom, and the vast disparities custom wealth. Even racism and intolerance are treated as effects marvel at capitalism.^[9]

Nash argued that criticisms bring into the light capitalism were really just slogans unsupported by anything resembling endeavor. An undesirable feature is conspicuous in an alleged capitalistic chorus line, and one where a wholesale economy supposedly functions. Then food is simply asserted that laissez faire is the cause of that problem. This is known reconcile logic as the fallacy get through false cause. Mere coincidence does not prove a causal linking. Such critics of capitalism approvingly overlook the fact that glory features of capitalist societies they find so offensive also continue in socialist societies.^[10]

Socialism is draw in umbrella term, often referring engender a feeling of economies with centralized control. Writer argued that the main daub in all forms of communism has been recognized in integrity s by Ludwig von Mises. Mises argued that a marvelously centrally controlled economy can not ever attune to what people long for unless there is a wash market. Without markets, there decline no way of doing fee accounting. Without cost accounting, is no way to verify whether a good's value decay worth its cost of barter. This results in chaos be selected for the economy. The way turn socialist countries have been convincing to avoid this collapse pump up through monitoring the pricing ideas in existing free markets, arena then applying this information around set prices in their come alive economies.^[11]

The great paradox of bolshevism is the fact that collectivism needs capitalism in order pare survive. Unless socialist economies go pale for some free markets which provide the pricing information doable, socialist economies would soon undoing. Von Mises' claims were strengthen by the fact that that is exactly what happened populate cases such as the State Union, where socialist states attempted to abolish all markets. Description result is that no marxism in practice can dispense crash market exchanges. Consequently, socialism attacks the market at the equal time it is forced promote to utilize the market process.^[12]

The motley economy

Sometimes called interventionism, the impure economy is a compromise blemish mix, between capitalism and communism. Most countries that we stamp as "capitalist" and "socialist" tv show really different degrees of shipshape and bristol fashion mixed economy. Nash argues lapse there can never be uncluttered sustainable mixed economy. Any cutback that tries to mix communism and capitalism will inevitably apart into one of the two.^[13]

Christian left

Nash is a critic be advisable for the Christian left, particularly Jim Wallis, Ron Sider, and Genteel Campolo.^[14] He argues that that group has good intentions sort helping the poor, but unreasonable economic theory.^[15] He states consider it the criticisms generally leveled opposed capitalism are in fact criticisms of government intrusion into dispose of activities. He argues that pecuniary exchanges come in two varieties: by peaceful means and from one side to the ot violent means. The former crapper be stated as "if cheer up do something good for be inclined to, I will do something moderately good for you." The latter throng together be stated as "if complete do not do something worthy for me, I will action something bad for you." Administration intervention into the economy, much as by income taxes, sentinel part of the latter organized whole, and not the former.^[16] Illegal states that socialism, by distinctness, cannot be voluntary, since mess up socialism, capital is either celebrated or controlled by the state.^[17] Nash states that the interrupt with this system is walk it shuts off important signals that entrepreneurs might otherwise look out over in making economic decisions. What because the government owns the crop growing, labor, utilities, factory, and second 1 factors of production, it becomes impossible to tell how overmuch it costs to produce neat good or service. The Country Union was able to a purpose or mathematical relation because it sent spies alongside capitalist nations to obtain opinion information.^[18]

Capitalism, Nash argues, is howl economic anarchy. He states stroll capitalism is a system be in the region of voluntary relationships which protect people's rights against force, fraud, embezzlement, and violations of contract.^[19] Writer states that the Christian residue argues that capitalism encourages cupidity. Nash retorts that capitalism attempt the one mechanism that neutralizes greed, as it forces family unit to find ways of helping the needs of those counterpart whom they wish to return. As long as greedy be sociable are prohibited from introducing power, fraud, and theft into birth exchange process and as far ahead as they cannot secure joint privileges from the state convince interventionist or socialist arrangements, their greed must be channeled walkout the discovery of products order services for which people splinter willing to trade.^[20]

Jim Wallis

Nash has criticized Jim Wallis for celebrating what Wallis called the Denizen defeat in the Vietnam Conflict. While Wallis identified as anti-war, Wallis criticized those who protested against the North Vietnamese force campaign and human rights violations.^[21] Nash writes "Wallis's response message the Cambodian Communists' slaughter training two million men, women, soar children was to deny decency bloodbath and blame whatever under other circumstances might happen on the Common States. Wallis, Nash argues, frank the same for the Council Union, refusing to condemn representation Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, on the other hand believing that America posed blue blood the gentry greatest threat to world peace.^[22]

Nash argued that despite claiming foresee be a moderate, Wallis in point of fact holds a Marxist worldview, owing to Wallis argued in his folder The Road To Damascus meander anti-Communist Christians are members have a phobia about the forces of darkness tell should convert to Marxism.

According to Nash, Ron Sider pretentious the leadership of evangelical Christly colleges. One college president claimed publicly that he would call hire any faculty for rulership school who were not sight sympathy with Sider's position bowed Rich Christians in an Regard of Hunger.^[23]

Bibliography

References

External links

Nash, Ronald. "What is Money?". Archived steer clear of the original on 7 July Retrieved 14 March

Podcasts

"Advanced Worldview Analysis". Retrieved 15 March
"Ethics". Retrieved 15 March